Single-species plantations of exotic trees, biological deserts or islands of plant diversity? Contrasting biotic and abiotic situations in northern Kivu (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

Authors

Désiré Katembo KASEKETE
Université de Kisangani Faculté des sciences BP 2012, Kisangani République démocratique du Congo -- Université officielle de Ruwenzori Faculté des sciences BP 560, Butembo République démocratique du Congo
Christien Kakule KIMBULUMA
Université de Kisangani Faculté des sciences BP 2012, Kisangani République démocratique du Congo
Nils BOURLAND
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Jalan CIFOR Situ Gede, Sindang Barang Bogor Barat 16115 Indonesia -- Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale Service de biologie du bois 3080 Tervuren Belgique -- Resources & Synergies Development (R&SD) Rue du Vallon 81 1332 Genval Belgique
Thomas DROUET
Université libre de Bruxelles Faculté des sciences Laboratoire d’Écologie végétale et biogéochimie (EVB) CP 244, 50 av. F.D. Roosevelt 1050 Bruxelles Belgique
Jean-Remy MAKANA
Université de Kisangani Faculté des sciences BP 2012, Kisangani République démocratique du Congo
Kamabu VASOMBOLWA
Université de Kisangani Faculté des sciences BP 2012, Kisangani République démocratique du Congo
Jean-Pierre MATE
École régionale postuniversitaire d’aménagement et de gestion intégrés des forêts et territoires tropicaux (ERAIFT) Université de Kinshasa Commune de Lemba BP 15 373, Kinshasa République démocratique du Congo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2022.352.a36810

Keywords


sous-bois, relevé floristique, aire minimale, facteur écologique, analyse multivariée, espèces indicatrices, plantation d’espèce exotique, République démocratique du Congo.

Abstract

While forest plantations are a topic attracting growing interest in Central Africa, their undergrowth has been little studied. In order to assess the potential contribution of plantations of exotic species to the restoration of plant cover on anthropised land in Kivu (Democratic Republic of the Congo), the plant diversity of their understorey was characterised and compared in a selection of single-species plantations of Eucalyptus saligna and Grevillea robusta on two sites (Sake and Kirumba) with different altitudinal and pedoclimatic conditions. The variations in plant composition found by the surveys was then analysed according to certain ecological parameters. Finally, indicator species of the altitudinal and pedoclimatic conditions at each site were identified. The data collected in 2018 and 2020 in 12 plantations, using the minimum area method, showed a high degree of heterogeneity in the plant composition of the understorey. Although herbaceous species predominated, some woody and liana species were also found in these understoreys. The species richness did not differ significantly between sites or between the tree species planted. Species richness varied from one survey to another depending on latitude, soil pH and bioavailable aluminium and magnesium concentrations. Thirteen indicator species for the altitudinal and pedoclimatic conditions of the sites were identified altogether, nine for Sake and four for Kirumba. Repetition of the surveys increased the sampling effort even though the minimum area did not change significantly over two years. This study highlighted the contribution of exotic species plantations to the recovery of plant cover on potentially degraded sites in Kivu and suggested management measures suited to the physico-chemical properties of the soils. The use of indicator species of pedoclimatic conditions as predictors of site productivity deserves to be tested in the plantations studied, in order to verify whether their presence could be used as a tool for selecting sites for reforestation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhtar N., Bergmeier E., 2015. Species richness, alpha and beta diversity of trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants in the woodlands of Swat, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47 (6): 2017-2113.

https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:47039190

Akobundu I. O., Agyakwa C. W., 1989. Guide des adventices d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Ibadan, Nigeria, Institut international d’agriculture tropicale, 522 p.

Alexandre F., 2003. L’étagement de la végétation en montagne : un modèle à revisiter. L’information Géographique, 67 (1) : 45-59. https://doi.org/10.3406/ingeo.2003.2875

Arroyo-Rodríguez V., Fahrig L., Tabarelli M., Watling J. I., Tischendorf L., Benchimol M., et al., 2020. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters, 23 (9): 1404-1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13535

Baillargeon S., 2021. Prétraitement de données en R. Université Laval, 61 p. https://stt4230.rbind.io/manipulation_donnees/pretraitement_donnees_r/

Barthlott W., Mutke J., Rafiqpoor D., Kier G., Kreft H., 2005. Global centers of vascular plant diversity. Nova Acta Leopoldina NF, 342: 61-83. uni-goettingen.de

Bernhard-Reversat F., 2001. Effect of Exotic Tree Plantations on Plant Diversity and Biological Soil Fertility in the Congo Savanna: With Special Reference to Eucalypts. Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR-ICRAF, 71 p. https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1008

Bremer L. L., Farley K. A., 2010. Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19: 3893-3915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4

Brockerhoff E. G., Jactel H., Parrotta J. A., Ferraz S. F. B., 2013. Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management, 301: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.018

Carnus J.-M., Parrotta J., Brockerhoff E. G., Arbez M., Jactel H., Kremer A., et al., 2006. Planted forests and biodiversity. Journal of Forestry, 104 (1): 65-77. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/47902

Chevalier R., Gautier G., Archaux F., 2010. Relevés floristiques pour le suivi de la biodiversité végétale des écosystèmes forestiers : éléments de réflexion pour faire les bons choix. Revue Forestière Française, 62 (2) : 141-154. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/34651

Chianucci F., Cutini A., 2012. Digital hemispherical photography for estimating forest canopy properties: Current controversies and opportunities. iForest, 5 (6): 290-295. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0775-005

Ciesielski H., Sterckeman T., 1997. Determination of cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in soils by means of cobalt hexamine trichloride. Effects of experimental conditions. Agronomy, 17 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19970101

Climate-data.org, 2021. Base de données climatiques en ligne. https://fr.climate-data.org/

Cottenie A., Camerlynck R., Verloo M., Dhaese A., 1979. Fractionation and determination of trace elements in plants, soils and sediments. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 52: 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198052010045

De Cáceres M., Legendre P., 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90 (12): 3566-3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1

De Wildeman E., 1940. De l’origine de certains éléments de la Flore du Congo Belge et des transformations de cette flore sous l’action de facteurs physiques et biologiques. Bruxelles, Belgique, Institut royal colonial belge, Mémoires, 363 p. Kaowarsom.be

Djego J., Gibigaye M., Tente B., Sinsin B., 2012. Analyses écologique et structurale de la forêt communautaire de Kaodji au Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6 (2) : 705-713. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i2.14

Dufrêne M., Legendre P., 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67 (3): 345-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963459

FAO, 2021. Portail d'information sur les sols. fao.org

Frazer G. W., Canham C. D., Lertzman K. P., 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs. User’s manual and program documentation, 36 p. https://rem-main.rem.sfu.ca/downloads/Forestry/GLAV2UsersManual.pdf

Ganglo J. C., 2005. Groupements de sous-bois, identification et caractérisation des stations forestières : cas d’un bois au Bénin. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 285 (3) : 35-46. https://revues.cirad.fr/index.php/BFT/article/view/20270/20029

Gillet F., De Foucault B., Julve P., 1991. La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée : objets et concepts. Candollea, 46 (2) : 315-340. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/82174?ln=fr

Kessler M., 2000. Elevational gradients in species richness and endemism of selected plant groups in the central Bolivian Andes. Plant Ecology, 149: 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500710274

Laghmouch M., Hardy B., 2005. Carte géologique de la république démocratique du Congo. Bruxelles, Belgique, Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale, 1 p.

Le Floc’h E., 2008. Guide méthodologique pour l’étude et le suivi de la flore et de la végétation. Tunis, Tunisie, Collection Roselt/OSS, 175 p. http://www.secheresse.info/spip.php?article7573

MacLean D. A., Adams G., Pelletier G., Amos-Binks L., Carle J.-F., Chicoine B., et al., 2010. Dynamique forestière, succession et habitats selon différents niveaux de sylviculture. Edmonton, Canada, Réseau de gestion durable des forêts, 89 p. https://www.fundymodelforest.net/images/pdfs/PublicationsSFMN-FR.pdf

Marcon E., 2018. Mesures de la Biodiversité. Master, UMR Écologie des forêts de Guyane (ECOFOG), Kourou, France, 275 p. https://hal-agroparistech.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-01205813v5

Ngongo R., 2015. La vulnérabilité des aires protégées de la RDC : cas du parc national des Virunga. Goma, RDC, Pole Institute, 68 p.

Ngueguim J. R., Zapfack L., Youmbi E., Riera B., Onana J., Foahom B., et al., 2010. Diversité floristique sous canopée en plantation forestière de Mangombe-Edea (Cameroun). Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 14 (1) : 167-176. https://popups.uliege.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=5229

Nichol J. E., Abbas S., 2021. Evaluating plantation forest vs. Natural forest regeneration for biodiversity enhancement in Hong Kong. Forests, 12 (5): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050593

Novor S., Abugre S., 2020. Growth performance, undergrowth diversity and carbon sequestration potentials of tree species stand combinations, Ghana. Open Journal of Forestry, 10 (1): 135-154. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2020.101010

Oksanen J., Blanchet G. F., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., et al., 2019. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html

Onyekwelu J. C., Olabiwonnu A. A., 2016. Can forest plantations harbour biodiversity similar to natural forest ecosystems over time? International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 12 (1-2): 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1162199

Parrotta J. A., 1995. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6 (5): 627-636. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3236433

Pawson S. M., Brin A., Brockerhoff E. G., Lamb D., Payn T. W., Paquette A., et al., 2013. Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22 (1): 1203-1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8

Pickering C. M., Butler S., 2009. Patterns in vascular plant species density in tall alpine herbfield along an increasing altitudinal gradient in an Australian alpine region. Australian Journal of Botany, 57 (3): 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT08202

Plieninger T., Gaertner M., 2011. Harnessing degraded lands for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 19 (1): 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2010.04.001

Poore M. E. D., Fries C., 1985. The ecological effects of eucalyptus. Rome, Italy, FAO, Forestry Paper, 88 p.

R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

Reigosa M. J., Sánchez-Moreiras A., González L., 1999. Ecophysiological approach in allelopathy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18 (5): 577-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689991309405

Rojas-Sandoval J., 2021. Grevillea robusta (chêne soyeux). Washington, DC, USA, CAB International, Department of Botany-Smithsonian NMNH. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/25866#02BD5AEB-7291-482F-BB98-7E7B7A2D0FE8

Rouxel C., 2010. Conservation de la biodiversité et développement durable des territoires. Transition agraire et paysagère en zone tampon de la Réserve de biosphère du Parc régional du W, Afrique de l’ouest. Économie Rurale, 320 (4): 39-52. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.2871

Schmidt M., Ouédraogo A., Dressler S., Thiombiano A., 2016. Méthodes de collection d’herbiers. Annales des Sciences Agronomiques, 20: 177-185. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301523083_Methodes_de_collection_d%27herbiers

Senbeta F., Teketay D., Näslund B.-A., 2002. Native woody species regeneration in exotic tree plantations at Munessa-Shashemene Forest, southern Ethiopia. New Forests, 24: 131-145. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1021201107373

Shakeri Z., Simberloff D., Bernhardt‐Römermann M., Eckstein R. L., 2021. The impact of livestock grazing and canopy gaps on species pool and functional diversity of ground flora in the Caspian beech forests of Iran. Applied Vegetation Science, 24 (3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12592

Skolmen R. G., 1990a. Eucalyptus saligna Sm. In: Burns R. M., Honkala B. H. (eds). Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Washington, DC, USA, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 654, 318-324. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/misc/ag_654_vol2.pdf

Skolmen R. G., 1990b. Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. In: Burns R. M., Honkala B. H. (eds). Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Washington, DC, USA, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 654, 370-373. http://na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/volume_2/grevillea/robusta.htm

Stephan K., Miller M., Dickinson M. B., 2010. First-order fire effects on herbs and shrubs: Present knowledge and process modeling needs. Fire Ecology, 6 (1): 95-114. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0601095

Tassin J., Missamba-Lola A. P., Marien J.-N., 2011. Biodiversité des plantations d’eucalyptus. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 309 (3) : 27-35. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2011.309.a20463

The Catalogue of Life Partnership, 2017. APG IV: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. https://doi.org/10.15468/fzuaam

Trochain J.-L., 1966. Types biologiques chez les végétaux intertropicaux (Angiospermes). Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, 113 (2) : 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1966.10838486

Watling J. I., Arroyo-Rodríguez V., Pfeifer M., Baeten L., Banks-Leite C., Cisneros L. M., et al., 2020. Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies. Ecology Letters, 23 (4): 674-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13471

WWF-Belgique, 2020. Rapport annuel 2020. Bruxelles, Belgique, WWF, 59 p. https://wwf.be/sites/default/files/2021-01/WWF-rapport-annuel-2020.pdf

Yirdaw E., Luukkanen O., 2003. Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus plantations in the Ethiopian highlands. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 567-582. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022483700992

Zaiton S., Sheriza M. R., Ainishifaa R., Alfred K., Norfaryanti K., 2020. Eucalyptus in Malaysia: Review on environmental impacts. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 13 (2): 79-94. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2020-001

Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1490
  • PDF-Accès libre (Français)
    928

Received

2021-10-27

Published

2022-05-01

How to Cite

KASEKETE, D. K., KIMBULUMA, C. K., BOURLAND, N. ., DROUET, T. ., MAKANA, J.-R. ., VASOMBOLWA, K. ., & MATE, J.-P. (2022). Single-species plantations of exotic trees, biological deserts or islands of plant diversity? Contrasting biotic and abiotic situations in northern Kivu (Democratic Republic of the Congo). BOIS & FORETS DES TROPIQUES, 352, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2022.352.a36810

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.