Participatory methodologies applied to the analysis of tropical cloud forest deforestation in San Luis Potosí, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2013.318.a20515Keywords
Participatory methodology, tropical cloud forest, deforestation, natu- ral resources, San Luis Potosí Sate, MexicoAbstract
Tropical cloud forest is one of the most biodiverse ecosystems in the world. In San Luis Potosí State, Mexico, during the last 35 five years 2,868 hectares of this forest cover have been removed. Within this context, this paper analyses the causes and likely alternatives to protect the last tropical cloud forest remnants through participatory research techniques such as workshops, participatory mapping, transects, semi structured interviews, and participant observation. The main causes driving forest removal are logging contracts, public subsidies to promote stock raising, land clearing for cultivation and selective logging. Although the environmental services ren- dered by tropical cloud forest are known, they are less appreciated than those provided by agriculture and stock raising activities. In addition, underdevelop- ment, poverty and land tenure problems are also detrimental factors of this ecosystem, which could disappear in the following years. Finally, this paper argues that the creation of community-based forest reserves seems to be the only fea- sible alternative for the conservation of this declining ecosystem.
Downloads
References
BAUTISTA A., DEL CASTILLO R., GUTIÉRREZ C., 2003. Patro-
nes de desarrollo del suelo asociados con sucesión secun- daria en un área originalmente ocupada por bosque mesó- filo de montaña. Ecosistemas 12 (3). www.redalyc.org
CHAMBERS R., 1994. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of Experience. World Development, 22 (9): 1253-
CHALLENGER A., 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México, pasado, presente y futuro. CONABIO-IB-UNAM-Agrupación Sierra Madre. México, D.F., 847 p.
EXPÓSITO M., 2003. Diagnóstico Rural Participativo. Una guía práctica. Centro Cultural Poveda, República Domini- cana, 118 p.
FLEISCHNER T., 1994. Ecological cost of livestock grazing in western North America. Conservation Biology, 8 (3): 629-644.
GARMENDIA E., STAGL S., 2010. Public participation for sus- tainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economic, 69: 1712-1722.
GEILFUS F., 1997. 80 Herramientas para el Desarrollo Partici- pativo. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agri- cultura, El Salvador, 205 p.
FORTANELLI M. J., GARCÍA J. P., CASTILLO P. L., 2014. Estruc-
tura y composición de la vegetación del bosque de niebla de Copalillos, San Luis Potosí, México. Acta Botánica Mexi- cana, 106: 161-186.
HERLIHY P., KNAPP G., 2003. Maps of, by, and for the Peo- ples of Latin America. Human Organization. Journal of the Society for Applied Anthropology, 62 (4): 303-314.
LEIJA G., REYES H., FORTANELLI J., PALACIO G., 2011. Situa-
ción actual del bosque de niebla en el estado de San Luis Potosí. Investigación y Ciencia, 53: 3-11.
MERINO L., 2004. Conservación o deterioro. El impacto de las políticas públicas en las instituciones comunitarias y en los usos de los bosques en México. INE-SEMARNAT. Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible A. C. México, 331 p.
MONTAGNINI F., SUÁREZ A., ARAÚJO M., 2008. Participatory
approaches to ecological restoration in Hidalgo, Mexico. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 295 (1): 5-20.
OSTROM E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Reino Unido, 271 p.
PETERSON N., 2011. Excluding to incluide: (Non) participa- tion in Mexican natural resource management. Agriculture and Human Values, 2: 99-107.
PETTIT E., RAYMOND F., PHILLIP L., 1995. Grazing in remnant woodland vegetation: changes in species composition and life form groups. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6: 121-130.
PUIG H., 2001. Diversité spécifique et déforestation : l´exemple des forêts tropicales humides du Mexique. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 268 (2): 41-55.
REED M., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management. A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141: 2417-2431.
RODELA R., CUNDILL G., WALS A., 2012. An analysis of the methodological underpinnings of social learning research in natural resource management. Ecological Economic, 77: 16-26.
RZEDOWSKI J., 1986. Vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, México, 432 p.
RZEDOWSKI J., 1996. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México, Acta Botánica Mexicana, 35: 25-44.
SAHAGUN J., REYES H., FLORES J. L., CHAPA L., 2011. Modeli-
zación de escenarios de cambio potencial en la vegetación y uso de suelo en la Sierra Madre Oriental de San Luis Potosí, México. Journal of Latin American Geography, 10 (2): 65-86.
WILLIAMS G., MANSON, R., ISUNZA E. 2002. La fragmenta-
ción del bosque mesófilo de montaña, patrones de uso del suelo en la región oeste de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. Madera y Bosques, 8 (1): 73-89.
ZABALA N., 2005. Diagnóstico Rural Participativo. Dicciona- rio de Acción Humanitaria y Cooperación al Desarrollo. dicc.hegoa.efaber.net
Downloads
Issue
Section
-
Abstract429
-
PDF (Français)2708
Published
How to Cite
License
All articles are published in Open Access. They are governed by Author's rights and by the creative commons licenses. The license used is Attribution (CC BY 4.0).
