Payments for environmental services and Development. Combining conservation incentives with investment

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00056

Mots-clés


services, ecosystem services, incentives, environmental policies, resource conservation, investment, intensification, impact assessment

Résumé

Version française de l'article

Paying communities or producers to maintain the quality of water or biodiversity; encouraging farmers to adopt environmentally friendly practices; paying developing countries to avoid deforestation and thereby reduce CO2 emissions: interest in payments for environmental services (PES) is growing throughout the world. However, past experience shows that PES are not without their problems: the criterion used to determine the amount; the methods used to evaluate effectiveness; and the uncertain use of payments, etc. Hence the proposal to combine direct incentives to protect ecosystems, especially forests, with the ecological intensification of agriculture and investment in land.

Biographie de l'auteur

Alain Karsenty

Alain Karsenty is a social scientist, researcher in forest policy and economics at CIRAD, UPR BSef (Forest Resources and Forest ecosystems goods and services internal research unit. He focuses on the analysis of public policy on forests, land and environment in developing countries, especially in Central Africa.

Références

Author's publications

Buba J., Karsenty A. (avec Bassaler N. et Ongolo S.), 2010. La lutte contre la déforestation dans les « États fragiles » : une vision renouvelée de l’aide au développement. Paris, Centre d’analyse stratégique, Note de veille n° 180. http://archives.strategie.gouv.fr/cas/content/note-de-veille-n%c2%b0-180-juin-2010-la-lutte-contre-la-deforestation-dans-les-%c2%ab-etats-fragiles-%c2%bb.html

Gregersen H., El Lakany H., Karsenty A., White A., 2010. Does the Opportunity Cost Approach Indicate the Real Cost of REDD+? Rights and Realities of Paying for REDD+. Washington, Rights and Resources Initiative, 23 p. https://rightsandresources.org/en/publication/does-the-opportunity-cost-approach-indicate-the-real-cost-of-redd/ - http://agritrop.cirad.fr/556220/

Karsenty A., Sembrés T., Randrianarison M., 2010. Paiements pour services environnementaux et biodiversité dans les pays du Sud : le salut par la « déforestation évitée » ? Revue Tiers Monde 202 : 53-74. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.202.0057

Other references

Conseil d’analyse stratégique, 2009. L’approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes. Rapports et documents n° 18. Paris, La Documentation française. https://www.vie-publique.fr/rapport/30445-approche-economique-de-la-biodiversite-et-services-lies-aux-ecosystemes

Wunder S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, 26 p. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001760

Téléchargements

Métriques
Vues/Téléchargements
  • Résumé
    249
  • PDF
    744

Publié

2011-01-01

Comment citer

Karsenty, A. (2011). Payments for environmental services and Development. Combining conservation incentives with investment. Perspective, (7), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00056