Lower deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon. Supporting farm forestry

Auteurs

Lucas Mazzei
Philippe Sablayrolles

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00041

Mots-clés


forests, tropical forests, deforestation, forest protection, land use, natural resources management, small farms, agroecology, agroecosystems, participatory approaches, forest management, communal forests, cultivation, credit, financing

Résumé

Version française de l'article

Versão portuguesa do artigo

Since 2004, thanks to a monitoring and repression policy, deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has decreased substantially. If this trend is to continue, smallholder farmers need support to enable them to take advantage of their forest resources and to develop ecologically intensive agricultural systems.

Biographies des auteurs

Plinio Sist

Plinio Sist is a doctor of tropical plant biology (University of Paris VI), and has been a researcher at CIRAD since 1991. He focuses on the ecology and sustainable management of tropical rainforests. After 20 years spent in Indonesia and the Amazon, he is now based in Montpellier at the BSEF research unit (http://ur-bsef.cirad.fr/).

Lucas Mazzei

Lucas Mazzei is a forest engineer at the University of Brasília and a doctor of forest science at AgroParisTech. He has been a researcher at Embrapa (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) Amazônia Oriental, Belém (https://www.embrapa.br/amazonia-oriental) since 2010, and studies the dynamics of managed forests and the role of forest management in forest conservation.

Philippe Sablayrolles

Philippe Sablayrolles is a doctor of comparative agriculture (AgroParisTech). Since 1995, he has been working in Brazil for the international development NGO GRET (https://www.gret.org/?lang=en) on sustainable smallholder farming, natural resource management and forest policies.

Références

Authors' publications

Cruz H., Sablayrolles P., Kanashiro M., Amaral M., Sist P., 2011. Relação Empresa Comunidade no contexto do manejo florestal comunitario e familiar, uma contribuição do projeto Floresta em Pé. Belém, Parà, IBAMA. ISBN 978-85-7300-360-4. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/568768/

Drigo I., Piketty M-G., Pena W., Sist P., 2013. Long term economic viability of community-based forest management: A detailed analysis of two case studies in the Brazilian Amazon. Bois et forêts des tropiques 315 : 39-50. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2013.315.a20538

Sablayrolles P., Cruz H., Santos-Melo M., Drigo I, Sist P., 2013. Le potentiel de la production forestière paysanne en Amazonie brésilienne. Bois et forêts des tropiques 315 : 51-62. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2013.315.a20539

Sist P., Mazzei L., Drigo I., Barbosa T., Piketty M.G., 2010. Populations rurales et préservation de la forêt amazonienne brésilienne. Le Flamboyant (66-67) : 42-45. http://pliniosist.over-blog.com/pages/La-foret-amazonienne-bresilienne-le-role-des-populations-rurales-dans-sa-preservation-4303235.html

Other references

Assunção J., Gandour C., Rocha R., 2015. Deforestation Slowdown in the Legal Amazon: Prices or Policies? Environment and Development Economics 20 (6): 697-722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000078

Barreto P., Araujo E., 2012. O Brasil atingirá sua meta de redução do desmatamento. Belém, Imazon, 52 p. ISBN 978-85-86212-41-3. https://imazon.org.br/publicacoes/1884-2/

Humphries S., Holmes T.P., Kainer K., Koury C.G.G., Cruz E., de Miranda Rocha R., 2012. Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics 77: 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.018

Pereira D., Santos D., Vedreto M., Guimarães J., Verissimo A., 2010. Fatos Florestais da Amazonia. Belém, Imazon, 126 p. https://imazon.org.br/publicacoes/fatos-florestais-da-amazonia-2010/

Téléchargements

Métriques
Vues/Téléchargements
  • Résumé
    1440
  • PDF
    76

Publié

2013-01-01

Comment citer

Sist, P., Mazzei, L., & Sablayrolles, P. (2013). Lower deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon. Supporting farm forestry. Perspective, (22), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00041