Strengthening local organisations and biodiversity-based value chains in the Andean Amazon
Leveraging the climate negotiations
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00031Mots-clés
climate change, forests, natural resources, biodiversity, climate change adaptation, local communities, indigenous peoples, ecosystem servicesRésumé
Version française de l'article
Versión en español del artículo
In the Andean Amazon, forest communities use biodiversity without depleting natural resources and promote it within local organisations and value chains. This has three key benefits: preserving biodiversity, mitigating climate change and creating favourable conditions for adaptation to this change. In this capacity, the communities should be eligible for funding granted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, in order to strengthen these local organisations and value chains, which remain fragile.
Références
Authors' publications
Mikkolainen P., Pasquis R., 2014. BioCAN Biodiversity Programme for the Amazon Region of the Andean Community: Summary of Results. BioCAN, Comunidad Andina, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Finlandia, Lima, 58 p. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/575874/
Ortiz N., Pasquis R., 2012. Importancia estratégica de la Amazonía de la Comunidad Andina y retos regionales para la gestión sostenible de la biodiversidad. In: Gestión Ambiental en los países de la Comunidad Andina, Revista de la Integración n° 9, Lima, p. 110-117. http://www.comunidadandina.org/StaticFiles/OtrosTemas/MedioAmbiente/Revista9.pdf
Pasquis R., Mikkolainen P., 2014. Alianza de autoridades ambientales y de la sociedad civil para la conservación de la biodiversidad amazónica: lecciones aprendidas y retos para el futuro. BioCAN, Comunidad Andina, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Finlandia, Lima, 213 p. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/575873/
Other references
Ghazoul J., Garcia C., Kushalappa C. G., 2009. Landscape labelling: a concept for next-generation payment for ecosystem service schemes. Forest Ecology and Management 258 (9): 1889–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.038
Karsenty A. et al., 2013. Paying for the environment? Can the REDD+ mechanism and the Payment for Environmental Services (PES) tackle the underlying causes of deforestation? Cirad, Gret, Les Amis de la Terre, 7 p. https://ur-forets-societes.cirad.fr/en/publications-and-communication/online-resources/forest-economics-and-policy
Munang R. et al., 2014. Harnessing Ecosystem-based Adaptation to address the social dimensions of climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 56 (1): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2014.861676
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 2009. Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Montréal, CBD Technical Series 41, 126 p. ISBN 92-9225-134-1. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/28774
Téléchargements
-
Résumé205
-
PDF 70
Publié
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Chaque numéro est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 : Attribution - 4.0 International 
