Biological inputs and agricultural policies in South America: between disruptive innovation and continuity
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.19182/perspective/36383Mots-clés
biological input, biocontrol, biofertiliser, alternative technology, innovation, transition, technology coexistence, public policy, industry, on-farm production, conventional agriculture, organic agriculture, agroecology, healthCouverture
Résumé
Version française de l'article
In South America, public policies take a strong interest in alternative technologies to agricultural chemical inputs (pesticides and fertilisers). Some South American countries support biological inputs, also known as bioinputs, through national incentive programmes and regulatory changes. Argentina, Brazil and Colombia are playing a leading role. However, the intention behind this promotion of bioinputs is not to break with industrial agricultural production models, from which States derive a large part of their tax income through exports. Rather, the goal is to foster coexistence between chemical and biological inputs in the context of a transition towards the bioeconomy. In this sense, the promotion of bioinputs meets the expectations of many South American farmers, as well as those of the agricultural inputs industry, which over the last few decades has diversified into these technologies. But these industrial dynamics are counter to certain farmers’ movements that defend on-farm production of biological inputs.
Références
Author's publications
Goulet F., 2021. Characterizing alignments in sociotechnical transitions. Lessons from agricultural bioinputs in Brazil. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101580
Goulet F., Hubert M., 2020. Making a Place for Alternative Technologies: The Case of Agricultural Bio-Inputs in Argentina. Review of Policy Research 37 (4): 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12384
Goulet F., Aulagnier A., Hubert M., 2020. Del reemplazo tecnológico al desplazamiento de fronteras: las alternativas a los agroquímicos en Argentina, Brasil y Francia. In: Mombello L., Spivak L’Hoste A. (Eds.), Naturaleza y conocimientos en tensión. Buenos Aires, TeseoPress, p. 279-299. ISBN 978-987-86-5724-0. https://www.teseopress.com/bienes/
Goulet F., Krotsch T., 15 September 2020. Políticas públicas para los bioinsumos: hacia un espacio de intercambio en América Latina y El Caribe. IICA Blog. https://blog.iica.int/en/blog/politicas-publicas-para-los-bioinsumos-hacia-un-espacio-intercambio-en-america-latina-caribe
CIRAD platform in partnership for research and training (dP) mentioned
dP Public Policy and Rural Development in Latin America and the Caribbean network (dP PP-AL, https://www.pp-al.org/en)
Other references
CropLife Brasil, 2019. https://croplifebrasil.org/
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa). https://www.embrapa.br/en/international
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, IICA, 2020. https://www.iica.int/en
Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation (France), 2020. Stratégie nationale de déploiement du biocontrôle 2020-2025. November 2020. 28 p. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/quest-ce-que-le-biocontrole
Grupo Asociado de Agricultura Sustentável (GAAS, Brésil), 2020. http://www.grupoagrisustentavel.com.br
Téléchargements
-
Résumé1345
-
PDF 522
Publié
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Chaque numéro est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 : Attribution - 4.0 International