Geographical indications for agricultural and handicraft goods. The strength of the link to the origin as a criterion
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00046Mots-clés
agricultural products, foods, non food products, provenance, product labelling, certification, protection, market regulations, traditional technology, legislation, international trade, WTO, history, nutrition labellingRésumé
Version française de l'article
The recognition of geographical indications (GIs) by the World Trade Organization (WTO) has led many countries to establish a specific legal framework to protect their traditional local products, whether agricultural, foodstuff or handicraft. These changes are taking place within a heterogeneous international legal context. The European Union, for example, only protects GIs for agricultural products and foodstuffs. This regulation deprives designations of traditional handicraft goods, which are numerous in the countries of the South, of protection on the European market, and fosters risks of misuse. Historical analysis of the protection of GIs and practices in Europe and India nevertheless show that there is no justification for treating products differently according to their nature. Hence the proposal to create a new international and European legal framework based on the strength of the link between the product and its geographical origin. The strength of this link would be assessed using criteria pertaining to natural and human factors, whether individually or combined, which are relevant whatever the product is.
Références
Authors' publications
Marie-Vivien D., 2010. Le droit des indications géographiques en Inde : un pays de l’Ancien monde face aux droits français, européen et international. Thèse de doctorat (PhD Thesis), École des hautes études en sciences sociales, 612 p. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/558235/
Marie-Vivien D., 2010. The role of the State in the protection of Geographical Indications: from disengagement in France/Europe to significant involvement in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 121-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00375.x
Marie-Vivien D., 2013. The protection of geographical indications for handicraft goods or how to re-use the original concepts of natural and human factors. WIPO Journal 4 (2) : 191-205. https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=391&plang=EN
Other references
Audier J., 2008. Mondialisation et indications géographiques : applications nationales de l’accord Adpic, Section 3 Indications géographiques. Propriétés Intellectuelles 26. http://www.irpi.fr/revuepi/article.asp?ART_N_ID=398
Barham E., Sylvander B., 2011. Labels of origin for food: local development, global recognition. Cambridge, CABI, 218 p. ISBN 9781845933524.
Bérard L., Marchenay P., 2004. Les produits de terroir, entre cultures et règlements. Paris, CNRS Editions, 229 p. ISBN 978-2-271-06211-6.
Olszak N., 2001. Le droit des appellations d’origine et des indications de provenance. Paris, Tec&Doc, 187 p. ISBN : 978-2-7430-0492-7.
Téléchargements
-
Résumé338
-
PDF 449
Publié
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Chaque numéro est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 : Attribution - 4.0 International