Análisis molecular del microbioma bacteriano del rumen de dromedarios argelinos

Autores/as

    N. Sahraoui, R. Boukert, A. Fertoul, B. Taminiau, J.L. Hornick

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.37010

Palabras clave


Camélidos, microflora del tracto digestive, ambiente natural, fluido del rumen, Argelia

Resumen

Las comunidades bacterianas de los preestómagos, especialmente el rumen, juegan un papel importante en los procesos digestivos de los rumiantes y los seudorrumiantes. Para estudiar la microbiota del rumen en el seudorrumen de los camélidos (Camelus dromedarius) criados en un ambiente natural en Argelia, se determinó la diversidad bacteriana en 25 dromedarios utilizando la secuenciación del amplicón del gen del ARNr 16S. En el conjunto de muestras se identificó un total de 25 filums bacterianos, entre los cuales: Firmicutes (cerca del 85 ℅), Bacteroidetes (aproximadamente el 12 %) y, en menor medida, Proteobacteria (< 1 %). El conjunto de estos tres filums representa más del 97 % del total de las secuencias analizadas. Nuestros resultados son coherentes con las observaciones anteriores de diversidad y abundancia de las comunidades bacterianas en el rumen o el seudorrumen de otras especies de rumiantes (domésticos o salvajes). Sin embargo, la abundancia de los filums bacterianos individuales se ha mostrado notablemente dispar. En el artículo se discute la relación entre riqueza y tipo de régimen alimenticio, y composición del microbioma del rumen.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Afiliaciones

  • N. Sahraoui
    nasahraoui@gmail.com
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • R. Boukert
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • A. Fertoul
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • B. Taminiau
    Liege university, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Sciences – Microbiology, Liege, Belgium
  • J.L. Hornick
    Liege university, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Management in Animal Ressources, Liege, Belgium

    Citas

    Abbas A.M, Engelhardt W.V., Lechner Dol M., Luciano L. Mousa H.M., Reale E.,1995. Particularities in forestomach anatomy, physiology and biochemistry of camelids compared to ruminants. In: Tisserand J.L. (ed.). Elevage et alimentation du dromadaire. Zaragoza: CIHEAM (Options Méditerranéennes : Série B. Etudes et Recherches ; n 13), p. 19-32

    Berman H.L., McLaren M.R., Callahan B.J., 2020. Understanding and interpreting community sequencing measurements of the vaginal microbiome. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 127 (2): 139-146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15978

    Betancur-Murillo C.L., Aguilar-Marín S.B., Jovel J., 2023: A Key Player in Ruminal Metabolism. Microorganisms, 11 (1): 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010001

    Bhatt V.D., Dande S.S., Patil N.V, Joshi C.G., 2013. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Mol. Biol. Rep., 40: 3363 – 3371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2411-4

    Chen T., Long W., Zhang C., Liu S., Zhao L., Hamaker B.R., 2017. Fiber-Utilizing Capacity Varies in Prevotella – versus Bacteroides Dominated Gut Microbiota. Sci. Rep., 7 (1): 2594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4

    Carberry C.A., Kenny D.A., Han S., McCabe M.S., Waters S.M., 2012. Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78 (14): 4949–4958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07759-11

    Deusch S., Camarinha-Silva A., Conrad J., Beifuss U., Rodehutscord M., Seifert J.A., 2017. Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Rumen Microbiome Influenced by Various Diets and Microenvironments. Front. Microbiol. 24 (8):1605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01605

    Du C., Nan X., Wang K., Zhao Y., Xiong B., 2019. Evaluation of the digestibility of steam-exploded wheat straw by ruminal fermentation, sugar yield and microbial structure in vitro. RSC Adv., 9: 41775–41782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08167D

    Flint H.J., Bayer E.A., Rincon M.T., Lamed R., White B.A., 2008. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomics analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6: 121–131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1817

    Gharechahi J., Zahiri H.S., Noghabi K.A., Salekdeh G.H., 2015. In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 38: 67–76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.004

    Gharechahi J., Salekdeh G.H.A., 2018. Metagenomic analysis of the camel rumen’s microbiome identifies the major microbes responsible for lignocellulose degradation and fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 11: 216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1214-9

    Guan Y., Zhang H., Gao X., Shang S., Wu X., Chen J., Zhang W., et al., 2016. Comparison of the bacterial communities in feces from wild versus housed sables (Martes zibellina) by high-throughput sequence analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. AMB Expr 6: 98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0254-4

    Guan Y., Yang H., Han S., Feng L., Wang T., Ge J., 2017. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between wild and captive sika deer (Cervus Nippon hortulorum) from feces by high-throughput sequencing. AMB Expr., 7: 212, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0517-8

    He J., Hai L., Orgoldol K., Yi Li., Ming L., Guo F., Li G., et al., 2019. High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals the Gut Microbiome of the Bactrian Camel in Different Ages. Curr. Microbiol, .76: 810–817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01689-6

    Hinsu A.T., Tulsani N.J., Panchal K.J., Pandit R.J., Jyostsana B., Dafale N.A., Patil N.V., 2021. Characterizing rumen microbiota and CAZyme profile of Indian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in response to different roughage’s. Sci. rep., 11 (1): 1–14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88943-9

    Huws S.A., Edwards J.E., Kim E.J., Scollan N.D., 2007. Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems. J. Microbiol. Meth., 70: 565–569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013

    Iqbal A., Kha B.B., 2001. Feeding behaviour of camel. Review. Pak. J.Agric. Sci, 38: 58–63

    Ishaq S.L., Kim C.J., Reis D., Wright A.D.G., 2015. Fibrolytic Bacteria Isolated from the Rumen of North American Moose (Alcesalces) and Their Use as a Probiotic in Neonatal Lambs. PLoS ONE, 10 (12): e0144804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144804

    Jose V.L., Appoothy T., More R.P., Arun A.S., 2017. Metagenomic insights into the rumen microbial fibrolytic enzymes in Indian crossbred cattle fed finger millet straw. AMB Expr. 7: 13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0310-0

    Khana N.D., Zaied D.A.A., 1991. Work performance of the camel as drought and riding animal: a review. In: Wardeh M. F., Wilson R. T. (Eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Camel Production and Improvement. Arab Centre for Studies of Arid and Dry Lands, Damascus, Syria, p. 191–201

    Mc Laughlin R.W., Chen M., Zheng J., Zhao Q., Wang D., 2012. Analysis of the bacterial diversity in the fecal material of the endangered Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39 (5) : 5669–5676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1375-0

    Madigan M., Martinko J., 2005. Brock biology of microorganisms, 11th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 149–152

    Martens Eric C., Herbert C.C., Jerffrey I.G., 2008. Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont. Cell host & microbe, 4 (5): 447–457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.007

    Ming L., Yi L., Sirguleng S., Hasi J., He J., Hai L., Wang Z., et al., 2017. Comparative analysis of fecal microbial communities in cattle and Bactrian camels. PLoSOne, 12 (3): e0173062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173062

    Nguyen Cong O., Bernard T., Pham Kim D., Do Duc L., Nassim M., Nguyen Thi H., Thi H.N., et al., 2019. Growth performance, carcass quality characteristics and colonic microbiota profiles in finishing pigs fed diets with different inclusion levels of rice distillers’ by‐product. Anim. Sci. J., 90 (8): 948–960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13229

    Pitta D., Kumar S., Vecchiarelli B., Shirley D.J., Bittinger K., Baker L.D., Ferguson J.D., et al., 2014a. Temporal dynamics in the ruminal microbiome of dairy cows during the transition period. J. Anim. Sci., 92: 4014–4022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7621

    Pitta D.W., Parmar N., Patel A.K., Indugu N., Kumar S., Prajapathi K.B., Anand B.P., et al., 2014b. Bacterial diversity dynamics associated with different diets and different primer pairs in the rumen of Kankrej cattle. PloS one, 9: e111710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111710

    Qin W., Huang Y.G., Wang Lei., Lin G., Yang J., Song P., Gao H., et al., 2020. Gut Microbiota enabled Goitered Gazelle (Gazellasubgutturosa) to Adapt to Seasonal Changes. Pakistan J. Zool., 52 (5): 1637–1646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20181031121013

    Rabee A.E., Kewan K.Z., Sabra E.A., El Shaer H.M., Lamara M., 2021. Rumen bacterial community profile and fermentation in Barki sheep fed olive cake and date palm byproducts. Peer J., 9: e12447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12447

    Robinson T.F., Sponheimer M., Roeder B.L., Passey B., Cerling T.E., Dearing M.D., Ehleringer J.R., 2006. Digestibility and nitrogen retention in llamas and goats fed alfalfa, C3 grass, and C4 grasshays. Small Rumin. Res. 64: 162–168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.018

    Samsudin A.A., Wright A.D.G., Al Jassim R., 2012. Cellulolytic bacteria in the foregut of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78 (24) : 8836–8839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02420-12

    Shang S., Liu L., Ren J., Zhang H., Zhao W., Xu J., Man Q., et al.,2019. Gutmicrobiota of the scimitar-horned oryx, Oryx dammah. Folia Zool., 68 (4): 269–273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.019.2019

    Sibtain A., Baloch Yaqoob M., Hashmi N., Shakeel A., Zaman M.A., Tariq M., 2010. Economic importance of camel: Unique alternative under crisis. Pak. Vet. J., 30 (4): 191-197

    Šul’ák M., Sikorová L., Jankuvová J., Javorský P., Pristaš P., 2012 Variability of Actinobacteria, a minor component of rumen microflora. Folia Microbiol. 57: 351–353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-012-0140-7

    Von Engelhardt W., Dycke C., Lechner-Doll M., 2007. Absorption of shortchain fatty acids, sodium and water from the forestomach of camels. J. Comp. Physiol. B., 177 (6): 631–640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-007-0161-8

    Xu J., Mahowald M.A., Ley R.E., Lozupone C.A., Hamady M., et al., 2017. Evolution of symbiotic bacteria in the distal human intestine. PLoS Biol., 5 (7): e156.2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050156

    Zhang L., Chung J., Jiang Q., Sun R., Zhang J., Zhong Y., Re N., 2017. Characteristics of rumen microorganisms involved in anaerobic degradation of cellulose at various pH values. RSC Adv. 7: 40303–40310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06588D

    Zhu N., Yang J., Ji L., Liu J., Yang Yand Yuan H., 2016. Metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses of a corn stover-adapted microbial consortium EMSD5 reveal its taxonomic and enzymatic basis for degrading lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Biofuels., 9: 243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0658-z

Camelus dromedarius © N. Sahraoui

Descargas

Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    590
  • pdf
    255

Recibido

2022-10-13

Aceptado

2023-10-19

Publicado

2023-12-05

Cómo citar

Sahraoui, N., Boukert, R., Fertoul, A., Taminiau, B., & Hornick, J.-L. (2023). Análisis molecular del microbioma bacteriano del rumen de dromedarios argelinos. Revue d’élevage Et De médecine vétérinaire Des Pays Tropicaux, 76, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.37010

Número

Vol. 76 (2023)

Sección

Salud animal y epidemiología

Categorías

Licencia

© N.Sahraoui et al., publicado por CIRAD 2023

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Datos de los fondos

  • Université de Liège
    Números de la subvención Santé et productivité des élevages du dromadaire au sud d’Algérie;D01N01UN090120220002