Analyse moléculaire du microbiome bactérien dans le rumen du dromadaire algérien

Auteurs

    N. Sahraoui, R. Boukert, A. Fertoul, B. Taminiau, J.L. Hornick

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.37010

Mots-clés


Camélidés, microflore du tube digestif, environnement naturel, fluide du rumen, Algérie

Résumé

Les communautés bactériennes des pré-estomacs, notamment le rumen, jouent un rôle important dans les processus digestifs des ruminants et des pseudo ruminants. Pour étudier le microbiote du rumen dans le pseudo-rumen de camélidés (Camelus dromedarius) élevés dans un environnement naturel en Algérie, la diversité bactérienne a été déterminée chez 25 dromadaires en utilisant le séquençage de l’amplicon du gène de l’ARNr 16S. Un total de 25 phyla bactériens a été identifié sur l’ensemble des échantillons, dont les Firmicutes (près de 85 ℅), les Bacteroidetes (environ 12 %) et, dans une moindre mesure, les Proteobacteria (< 1 %), ces trois phyla représentant ensemble plus de 97 % de la totalité des séquences analysées. Nos résultats sont cohérents avec les observations antérieures de la diversité et de l’abondance des communautés bactériennes dans le rumen ou le pseudo-rumen d’autres espèces de ruminants (domestiques ou sauvages), bien que l’abondance des phyla bactériens individuels ait montré des disparités remarquablement élevées. Les liens entre la richesse et le type de régime alimentaire et la composition du microbiome du rumen sont discutés.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Affiliations

  • N. Sahraoui
    nasahraoui@gmail.com
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • R. Boukert
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • A. Fertoul
    Saad Dahlab University, Veterinary Institute of Science, Blida, Algeria
  • B. Taminiau
    Liege university, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Sciences – Microbiology, Liege, Belgium
  • J.L. Hornick
    Liege university, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Management in Animal Ressources, Liege, Belgium

    Références

    Abbas A.M, Engelhardt W.V., Lechner Dol M., Luciano L. Mousa H.M., Reale E.,1995. Particularities in forestomach anatomy, physiology and biochemistry of camelids compared to ruminants. In: Tisserand J.L. (ed.). Elevage et alimentation du dromadaire. Zaragoza: CIHEAM (Options Méditerranéennes : Série B. Etudes et Recherches ; n 13), p. 19-32

    Berman H.L., McLaren M.R., Callahan B.J., 2020. Understanding and interpreting community sequencing measurements of the vaginal microbiome. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 127 (2): 139-146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15978

    Betancur-Murillo C.L., Aguilar-Marín S.B., Jovel J., 2023: A Key Player in Ruminal Metabolism. Microorganisms, 11 (1): 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11010001

    Bhatt V.D., Dande S.S., Patil N.V, Joshi C.G., 2013. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Mol. Biol. Rep., 40: 3363 – 3371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2411-4

    Chen T., Long W., Zhang C., Liu S., Zhao L., Hamaker B.R., 2017. Fiber-Utilizing Capacity Varies in Prevotella – versus Bacteroides Dominated Gut Microbiota. Sci. Rep., 7 (1): 2594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02995-4

    Carberry C.A., Kenny D.A., Han S., McCabe M.S., Waters S.M., 2012. Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78 (14): 4949–4958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07759-11

    Deusch S., Camarinha-Silva A., Conrad J., Beifuss U., Rodehutscord M., Seifert J.A., 2017. Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Rumen Microbiome Influenced by Various Diets and Microenvironments. Front. Microbiol. 24 (8):1605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01605

    Du C., Nan X., Wang K., Zhao Y., Xiong B., 2019. Evaluation of the digestibility of steam-exploded wheat straw by ruminal fermentation, sugar yield and microbial structure in vitro. RSC Adv., 9: 41775–41782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08167D

    Flint H.J., Bayer E.A., Rincon M.T., Lamed R., White B.A., 2008. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomics analysis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 6: 121–131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1817

    Gharechahi J., Zahiri H.S., Noghabi K.A., Salekdeh G.H., 2015. In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 38: 67–76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.004

    Gharechahi J., Salekdeh G.H.A., 2018. Metagenomic analysis of the camel rumen’s microbiome identifies the major microbes responsible for lignocellulose degradation and fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 11: 216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1214-9

    Guan Y., Zhang H., Gao X., Shang S., Wu X., Chen J., Zhang W., et al., 2016. Comparison of the bacterial communities in feces from wild versus housed sables (Martes zibellina) by high-throughput sequence analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. AMB Expr 6: 98 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0254-4

    Guan Y., Yang H., Han S., Feng L., Wang T., Ge J., 2017. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between wild and captive sika deer (Cervus Nippon hortulorum) from feces by high-throughput sequencing. AMB Expr., 7: 212, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0517-8

    He J., Hai L., Orgoldol K., Yi Li., Ming L., Guo F., Li G., et al., 2019. High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals the Gut Microbiome of the Bactrian Camel in Different Ages. Curr. Microbiol, .76: 810–817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01689-6

    Hinsu A.T., Tulsani N.J., Panchal K.J., Pandit R.J., Jyostsana B., Dafale N.A., Patil N.V., 2021. Characterizing rumen microbiota and CAZyme profile of Indian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in response to different roughage’s. Sci. rep., 11 (1): 1–14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88943-9

    Huws S.A., Edwards J.E., Kim E.J., Scollan N.D., 2007. Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems. J. Microbiol. Meth., 70: 565–569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013

    Iqbal A., Kha B.B., 2001. Feeding behaviour of camel. Review. Pak. J.Agric. Sci, 38: 58–63

    Ishaq S.L., Kim C.J., Reis D., Wright A.D.G., 2015. Fibrolytic Bacteria Isolated from the Rumen of North American Moose (Alcesalces) and Their Use as a Probiotic in Neonatal Lambs. PLoS ONE, 10 (12): e0144804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144804

    Jose V.L., Appoothy T., More R.P., Arun A.S., 2017. Metagenomic insights into the rumen microbial fibrolytic enzymes in Indian crossbred cattle fed finger millet straw. AMB Expr. 7: 13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0310-0

    Khana N.D., Zaied D.A.A., 1991. Work performance of the camel as drought and riding animal: a review. In: Wardeh M. F., Wilson R. T. (Eds.). Proceedings of International Conference on Camel Production and Improvement. Arab Centre for Studies of Arid and Dry Lands, Damascus, Syria, p. 191–201

    Mc Laughlin R.W., Chen M., Zheng J., Zhao Q., Wang D., 2012. Analysis of the bacterial diversity in the fecal material of the endangered Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39 (5) : 5669–5676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1375-0

    Madigan M., Martinko J., 2005. Brock biology of microorganisms, 11th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 149–152

    Martens Eric C., Herbert C.C., Jerffrey I.G., 2008. Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont. Cell host & microbe, 4 (5): 447–457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.007

    Ming L., Yi L., Sirguleng S., Hasi J., He J., Hai L., Wang Z., et al., 2017. Comparative analysis of fecal microbial communities in cattle and Bactrian camels. PLoSOne, 12 (3): e0173062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173062

    Nguyen Cong O., Bernard T., Pham Kim D., Do Duc L., Nassim M., Nguyen Thi H., Thi H.N., et al., 2019. Growth performance, carcass quality characteristics and colonic microbiota profiles in finishing pigs fed diets with different inclusion levels of rice distillers’ by‐product. Anim. Sci. J., 90 (8): 948–960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13229

    Pitta D., Kumar S., Vecchiarelli B., Shirley D.J., Bittinger K., Baker L.D., Ferguson J.D., et al., 2014a. Temporal dynamics in the ruminal microbiome of dairy cows during the transition period. J. Anim. Sci., 92: 4014–4022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7621

    Pitta D.W., Parmar N., Patel A.K., Indugu N., Kumar S., Prajapathi K.B., Anand B.P., et al., 2014b. Bacterial diversity dynamics associated with different diets and different primer pairs in the rumen of Kankrej cattle. PloS one, 9: e111710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111710

    Qin W., Huang Y.G., Wang Lei., Lin G., Yang J., Song P., Gao H., et al., 2020. Gut Microbiota enabled Goitered Gazelle (Gazellasubgutturosa) to Adapt to Seasonal Changes. Pakistan J. Zool., 52 (5): 1637–1646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20181031121013

    Rabee A.E., Kewan K.Z., Sabra E.A., El Shaer H.M., Lamara M., 2021. Rumen bacterial community profile and fermentation in Barki sheep fed olive cake and date palm byproducts. Peer J., 9: e12447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12447

    Robinson T.F., Sponheimer M., Roeder B.L., Passey B., Cerling T.E., Dearing M.D., Ehleringer J.R., 2006. Digestibility and nitrogen retention in llamas and goats fed alfalfa, C3 grass, and C4 grasshays. Small Rumin. Res. 64: 162–168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.018

    Samsudin A.A., Wright A.D.G., Al Jassim R., 2012. Cellulolytic bacteria in the foregut of the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78 (24) : 8836–8839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02420-12

    Shang S., Liu L., Ren J., Zhang H., Zhao W., Xu J., Man Q., et al.,2019. Gutmicrobiota of the scimitar-horned oryx, Oryx dammah. Folia Zool., 68 (4): 269–273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.019.2019

    Sibtain A., Baloch Yaqoob M., Hashmi N., Shakeel A., Zaman M.A., Tariq M., 2010. Economic importance of camel: Unique alternative under crisis. Pak. Vet. J., 30 (4): 191-197

    Šul’ák M., Sikorová L., Jankuvová J., Javorský P., Pristaš P., 2012 Variability of Actinobacteria, a minor component of rumen microflora. Folia Microbiol. 57: 351–353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-012-0140-7

    Von Engelhardt W., Dycke C., Lechner-Doll M., 2007. Absorption of shortchain fatty acids, sodium and water from the forestomach of camels. J. Comp. Physiol. B., 177 (6): 631–640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-007-0161-8

    Xu J., Mahowald M.A., Ley R.E., Lozupone C.A., Hamady M., et al., 2017. Evolution of symbiotic bacteria in the distal human intestine. PLoS Biol., 5 (7): e156.2007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050156

    Zhang L., Chung J., Jiang Q., Sun R., Zhang J., Zhong Y., Re N., 2017. Characteristics of rumen microorganisms involved in anaerobic degradation of cellulose at various pH values. RSC Adv. 7: 40303–40310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06588D

    Zhu N., Yang J., Ji L., Liu J., Yang Yand Yuan H., 2016. Metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses of a corn stover-adapted microbial consortium EMSD5 reveal its taxonomic and enzymatic basis for degrading lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Biofuels., 9: 243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0658-z

Camelus dromedarius © N. Sahraoui

Téléchargements

Métriques
Vues/Téléchargements
  • Résumé
    336
  • pdf
    215

Reçu

13-10-2022

Accepté

19-10-2023

Publié

05-12-2023

Comment citer

Sahraoui, N., Boukert, R., Fertoul, A., Taminiau, B. et Hornick, J.-L. (2023) « Analyse moléculaire du microbiome bactérien dans le rumen du dromadaire algérien », Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux. Montpellier, France, 76, p. 1–5. doi: 10.19182/remvt.37010.

Numéro

Vol. 76 (2023)

Rubrique

Santé animale et épidémiologie

Catégories

Licence

© N.Sahraoui et al., publié par CIRAD 2023

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Funding data

  • Université de Liège
    Grant numbers Santé et productivité des élevages du dromadaire au sud d’Algérie;D01N01UN090120220002

Articles les plus lus par le même auteur ou la même autrice