Evaluation of the efficacy of flumethrin for tsetse control in Lutendele, Democratic Republic of Congo

Authors

    B. Lombe, J. Sumbu, J. Masumu, S. Mpiana, G. Tshilenge, J. Mande, T. Makumbu, T. Marcotty, E. Abatih, D. Berkvens, M. Boelaert, R. De Deken

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.10151

Keywords


Glossina, Swine, Insecticide, Control method, Evaluation, Vector, Democratic Republic Congo

Abstract

In the Democratic Republic of Congo animal and human Afri­can trypanosomoses are rife over very large areas. Pigs are the major feeding hosts of Glossina fuscipes quanzensis, the sole tsetse fly species present in suburban Kinshasa. In the context of integrated disease control, pig breeding could be used to advantage in tsetse control by applying insecticides on these animals. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by comparing the efficacy of flumethrin 1% as a pour-on formu­lation on pigs with the use of flumethrin-treated screens to control G. f. quanzensis and animal trypanosomosis in Luten­dele, suburban Kinshasa. After two years of applications, ento­mological surveys showed that the pour-on treatment of pigs reduced more the apparent density of tsetse flies than the flu­methrin-treated screens although the difference was not signif­icant. Throughout the study no parasite could be detected in the pigs by the parasitological method nor by molecular biol­ogy, but overall 28% of the pigs had positive serology (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21-33). Compared to treated screens, the treatment of pigs with flumethrin was identified as a signif­icant protective factor against seropositivity with an odds ratio equal to 0.28 (95% CI: 0.12-0.57). This study reveals that both control methods significantly reduced tsetse apparent densi­ties, but that the pour-on treatment of pigs seems to be more efficacious than the use of treated screens to protect them against trypanosomosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Affiliations

  • B. Lombe 1 - Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo. 2 - Université pédagogique nationale, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • J. Sumbu Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • J. Masumu 1 - Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo. 2 - Université pédagogique nationale, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • S. Mpiana Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • G. Tshilenge Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • J. Mande Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • T. Makumbu Laboratoire vétérinaire de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, République démocratique du Congo.
  • T. Marcotty 1 - Institut de médecine tropicale, Anvers, Belgique. 2 - VERDI-R&D, Erezée, Belgique.
  • E. Abatih Institut de médecine tropicale, Anvers, Belgique.
  • D. Berkvens Institut de médecine tropicale, Anvers, Belgique.
  • M. Boelaert Institut de médecine tropicale, Anvers, Belgique.
  • R. De Deken Institut de médecine tropicale, Anvers, Belgique.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1009
  • pdf (Français)
    204

Received

2015-01-29

Accepted

2015-01-29

Published

2014-01-01

How to Cite

Lombe, B., Sumbu, J., Masumu, J., Mpiana, S., Tshilenge, G., Mande, J., Makumbu, T., Marcotty, T., Abatih, E., Berkvens, D., Boelaert, M., & De Deken, R. (2014). Evaluation of the efficacy of flumethrin for tsetse control in Lutendele, Democratic Republic of Congo. Revue d’élevage Et De médecine vétérinaire Des Pays Tropicaux, 66(4), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.10151

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)